|
Tina Resch (born October 23, 1969) was a central figure in a series of incidents that came to be called the Columbus poltergeist case. In 1984, alleged telekinesis events at her home drew significant news media interest. A series of color photographs taken by photojournalist Fred Shannon, and published by ''The Columbus Dispatch'', were purported to show Resch sitting in an armchair with a telephone handset and phone cord flying in front of her, from left to right. Resch's story, and Shannon's photography, were featured on a 1993 episode of Unsolved Mysteries.〔 (【引用サイトリンク】 Unsolved Mysteries: Episode #238 ) Original U.S. airdate: May 19, 1993.〕 Skeptics and debunkers pointed out that much of the proclaimed evidence was anecdotal and thin and declared the case to be a hoax.〔〔Gordon, Henry, ''Extrasensory Deception: ESP, Psychics, Shirley MacLaine, Ghosts, UFOs'', Macmillan of Canada (1988). p. 107. ISBN 978-0771595394〕〔Goode, Erich, ''Paranormal Beliefs: A Sociological Introduction''. Waveland Pr Inc. (2000). p. 193. ISBN 978-1577660767〕 Paul Kurtz wrote that Resch was "a disturbed teenager" who faked poltergeist phenomena because she "craved attention".〔Kurtz, Paul, ''A Skeptic's Handbook of Parapsychology''. Prometheus Books (1985). p. 220. ISBN 978-0879753009〕 Resch was married and divorced twice, and had a child named Amber Boyer. In 1994, Resch was convicted of being responsible for the death of her three-year-old daughter, and she was sentenced to life imprisonment.〔 "The real story of Christina Resch Boyer: Did a 'perfect storm' of events lead to life imprisonment?" A lengthy front page story with color photo in which the publisher calls for a reexamination of the legal case by the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles.〕 ==Alleged poltergeist case== Tina Resch is the adopted daughter of Joan and John Resch.〔Couttie, Bob, ''Forbidden Knowledge: The Paranormal Paradox''. Lutterworth Press (1988). pp. 60-61. ISBN 978-0718826864〕 The Resches were well known in Columbus, as they were foster parents would had helped care for 250 children prior to 1984. 〔 Smith, B. "The Columbus Poltergeist." Skeptoid Podcast. Skeptoid Media, Inc., 6 Jan 2015. Web. 29 Mar 2015. http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4448〕 When she was 14, Tina watched the movie ''Poltergeist'', and shortly afterward the family reported seeing objects fly around their house.〔Wynn, Charles M. and Arthur W. Wiggins, ''Quantum Leaps in the Wrong Direction: Where Real Science Ends...and Pseudoscience Begins'', Joseph Henry Press (2001). p. 99. ISBN 978-0309073097〕 Reporter Mike Harden of ''The Columbus Dispatch'' was asked to assist the family, and involved photographer Fred Shannon. ''The Columbus Dispatch'' interviewed Tina, and later published several photos purporting to show a telephone flying through the air.〔Hines, Terrence, ''Pseudoscience and the Paranormal'', Prometheus Books (2003). pp. 98-100. ISBN 978-1573929790〕 Parapsychologist William Roll stayed in the Resch house to investigate the case, and claimed that there had been genuine "spontaneous psychokinesis".〔 Roll, however, never observed any object move by itself. In one incident, a picture fell from a wall in an upstairs room where Tina had been alone half an hour before; Roll was facing away from the picture when it fell.〔〔 James Randi, an investigator for the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal was refused access to the household,〔Nickell, Joe, ''The Outer Edge: Classic Investigations of the Paranormal'', Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (1996). p. 118. ISBN 978-1117887708〕 but investigated the case and suspected Tina had faked the alleged poltergeist occurrences.〔Randi, James, ''The Columbus Poltergeist Case: Part I''. ''Skeptical Inquirer'' 9: 221–35. (1984–85). (), ()〕 According to Terence Hines: "The Resch poltergeist turned out to be so elusive that no one ever actually saw a single object even start to move of its own accord. This included the newspaper photographer, who found that if he watched an object, it stubbornly refused to budge. So he would hold up his camera and look away... One of the photos obtained in this way was distributed by the Associated Press and touted widely as proof of the reality of the phenomenon. Examined closely, the photographic evidence in this case strongly suggested that Tina was faking the occurrences by simply throwing the phone and other “flying” objects when no one was looking. Randi’s careful analysis of the other photos, many unpublished, of Tina and her flying phone strengthen the conclusion that she was faking. Interestingly, the editor of ''The Columbus Dispatch'', Luke Feck, embarrassed by the revelation that he and his paper were taken in by so obvious a fake, refused Randi permission to print the photos he had given him earlier, in an apparent attempt to suppress the evidence of Tina’s trickery and the newspaper’s credulity."〔 In a later incident, a visiting television crew accidentally left a video camera on, which caught footage of Tina deliberately knocking over a table lamp, then screaming as if in fright, an event that had previously been ascribed to the poltergeist. When confronted with the videotape, Tina claimed she had done it to get the reporters to leave. Randi characterized the situation as a hoax by an adolescent girl seeking attention, saying, "examination of available material indicates that fraudulent means or perfectly explainable methods have been employed to provide the media with sensational details about an otherwise trivial matter." Randi examined a roll of photos taken by press photographers and said that they showed the girl's foot hooked beneath a sofa that had purportedly moved by itself, and that the glass in a picture frame that allegedly shattered on its own while in her hands was already broken before she ever picked it up. His conclusion of the case, as he reported in ''Skeptical Inquirer'', Spring 1985, was as follows: "The evidence for the validity of poltergeist claims in this case is anecdotal and thin, at best. The evidence against them is, in my estimation, strong and convincing."〔 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Tina Resch」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|